
Every time I read an article about Airbus or Boeing from AP, it never fails. Bad Airbus, good Boeing! Seriously, Associated Press, grow up.
For the last two years, AP has been Boeing’s cheerleader. Boeing does no wrong, even if it is late in its deliveries. But reporting delays for Airbus is amplified, put in a negative light and made into a bigger deal than when it happens to its rival. The problem is that it shows AP in an unfavorable light, by being partial when all we ask of them is impartial news reporting. Leave your comments home, that’s not what we ask for.
Case in point, after developing the biggest plan, Airbus and it’s giant double decker ran into delays. So what? What companies don’t? Is that a reason to cheer for the national rival? Are we back in High School here? But when Boeing runs into delays, as with its 787 fleet, they are justified and toned down. Is that journalism or creating a patriotic sense that we do better than others? Especially when I have no choice what airplanes I fly with?
In the aviation industry it is common to run into delays, especially if those delays are for security measures. Sure Airbus messed it up when the French and German bosses couldn’t agree. But the ones who got hurt, as in every case were the workers.
This kind of reporting is sub par, frankly boring and immature. What is it supposed to do for me? Is it supposed to pump me and only fly Boeing when I have no alternative but whatever airlines have? It’s silly and childish. AP Business should review its falling standards and report the news as is, without its personal beliefs and comments. Personally, I am bored with it.
Right, I guess I do the same but I try to be partial… Yes, even when France loses against England. It was a god game and the English played well. Period.