How Start Trek I nfluenced Science and Reality, Long Beach

Discuss on ooVoo

It’s no secret I am a Star Trek fan but I don’t have a Federation uniform hidden in my closet. No, I like it but it stops there.

I am watching my friend’s  Star Trek: Enterprise series. Enterprise was criticized by some fans and the genius suits at the network station decided to yank it off, for good or bad. The series was good if you pass the obvious “volatile” nature of humans. It was the thing I liked least about the show. It portrayed humans as emotional, irrational and good old gung ho folks. I don’t know about you but don’t see NASA like that. Oh, somehow, something that stills hasn’t grown on me is the theme song. What’s up with that? It has nothing to do with Star Trek. It sounds like a generic airwave popular song. It doesn’t inspire me at all.

I also noticed Star Trek was also honored with an  asteroid belt is named for George Takei, A.K.A. Sulu. Pretty cool.

It goes without saying how cell phones were influenced by the  Star Trek Original Series communicators, and later on  Star Trek The Next Generation with their other gizmos, such as the portable detectors have influenced our real life PDAs.

It proves to show you can have good shows that bring forth a plausible intelligent future portraying human nature’s better side and good overall evolution. My favorite quote from Cpt Picard when he answers this person’s question who came on board from the distant past and tells the Cpt that he must have a lot of money to have this ship. Picard looks at him in an intrigued way and say they have done away with money a long time ago. They work for the betterment of themselves. Wow, if that doesn’t ring a bell into any person looking for a better world, I don’t know what else will.

Lastly, and not so much of subject, if we spent 10% of the world advertising budget we would have famine irradicated from our planet. Something to think about.

Does A Recession Really Matter? Long Beach

Discuss on ooVoo

I love a good post like this?  Does recession matter? This is what I saw on Calculated Risk. Not only do I like their posts most of the time but by definition a good posts grabs you and talks about an obvious thing.

In this case, it’s about the scary R word. What’s so scary about a recession? Obviously not all of them have to be as bad as the thirties of last century? It can be mild, of tough but mostly, it usually brings about badly needed change. Of course, sometimes it leaves the door open for system that will negatively impact the future. I won’t name names…

Here is a good definition from the National Bureau of Economic Research:

“A recession is a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in real GDP, real income, employment, industrial production, and wholesale-retail sales.” Perfect clinical sense.

Calculated Risk believes that the U.S. economy is currently in the Sluggish Growth / mild Recession category. It would make sense. Does that mean we can’t use the term recession for fear of hurting sensitive people? How about slow growth? Does that make it better? The problem is always the same. What is normal?

It makes sense that what matters is what happens when the economy slows. Unemployment rises and if the economy slides into a recession, then employment declines month after month. Does that look familiar to anyone? If profit growth slows, the economy slows. We are already seeing declining profits in housing related sectors, and we will probably see declining profits for the financials too.

Thanks Calculated Risk. As always pertinent and to the point.