
A little while at a party we had over here, I Realtor friend of mine was considering Apple but was reluctant because of "compatibily" issues. I said I would look into it but so far, it looked like Parellels would take care of MLSs shortecomings, mainly being Windows centric.
Another thing I hear, sometimes based on true facts and sometimes very debatable are prices. Macs are so expensive. Depends on what you are after. If you are looking for quality hardware, great customer serive (in my experience) and upgrades in hardware for the same price as the last hardware sold, then Mac edges out the competition over and over. Take for instance, they respond to the market. The models are upgraded to faster CPUs and buses, larger hard drives, and faster GPUs (graphics processing units) without raising their prices. In other words, instead of cutting price which sends a clear message that their quality is not good as PC makers do, they raise the bars with more capacity. For the same money, you get more every time you upgrade, hardly the case for PCs.
PC vendors are brokers for Asian PC manufacturers, get with it! Apple may contract its hardware but does its in-house engineering. In all fairness, I believe Dell does also but seriously cuts corners in services. Talking about hardware quality, how does the average PC last? Two years best case scenario. Macs last much longer. Laptop have incredible quality and mine still looks new three years after. Hardly a case I could have made even with my trusty Micron pC or an IBM.
Java Talk, technical
Microsoft has had a tumultuous relationship with Sun and it showed in Java. Consumers got msotly hurt as Microsoft dragged its feet to approve modern version of Java hoping to push programmer towards its iteration of Java. While Mac runs Java client and server applications directly using a Java virtual machine that Apple developed, validated, and maintained, it includes two Java application servers, JBoss and WebObjects, are bundled with OS X Server. OS X includes stable editions of dynamic languages, including Perl, Ruby, PHP, Python, and JavaScript. PDF, HTML, XML, and OpenGL amongst others. Macs startup with standard-based Extensible Firmware Interface instead of a closed, proprietary BIOS as Windows does, even though Apple includes EFI extensions that transparently support operating systems that don’t yet work with EFI.
Sorry but Vista is Tiger and we are ready to receive Leopard. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Any specialized journalist attending the keynote audience at Apple’s 2006 Worldwide Developer Conference will tell you.
Mixed Network?
All Macs are identical and policy management are uniform. Hardly the case with Windows. Remote Desktop 3 will uniformely install whatever on whoever’s Macs regardless of it between desktop, laptop, Intel. PPC, remote and mobile, period.
CNN, and a bunch of high-profile users use Mac in the enterprise. US Military, medecine, film and prestigious Universities have been using Mac for heavy simulations and engineering. Why are they not using Windows? With Leopard pursuit of full Unix compliance, watch more enterprise smiling at Apple.
Also Apple has better ears than Windows. Sure users yell at Apple and eventually Apple listens. Microsoft does not however. Maybe because of the market shares? Then I would rather give mooney to the better quality that listens to my needs and meets them, Apple.
Predictions are always easy to do but read all this and figure out Apple is building the foundation to be a welcome guest in the enterprise tomorrow.



